sedir yazdı:Hellhound 7750'nin bakımının kolay olduğunu söyledi. Ben de 2894-2'de arıza olduğu takdirde kolay müdahale edildiğini, tüm mekanizma sökülmeden onarılabildiğini, gereken parça değişimlerinin daha kolay yapıldığını okudum. Birbirini dengeleyen bakım-onarım özellikleri var. Kendi adıma saatin ince oluşunu ben de önceliyorum.
Ben de ETA 2894-2 servisi zor diye okudum, sonuç olarak da entegre kronograf mekanizması daha iyidir diyor.
https://wornandwound.com/watchmakers-be ... onographs/Then there’s the separate question of servicing. Most watchmakers will happily service an integrated chronograph, and for a modern caliber most can do so with considerable ease. Parts are generally readily available, and timekeeping and function are rarely a problem. Modules are a different story.
The ETA 2894-2, for example, is very tricky to service. It requires expensive movement holders to re-assemble all parts correctly, and without these movement holders it is practically impossible to do. You do have the option of purchasing a new module, but this isn’t a cost effective practice. The Dubois Depraz is much more service-friendly (though not all too simple either), and I have repaired many over the years. However, I know many watchmakers that won’t touch them. The module can be fiddly to assemble due to the fact that all the wheels and levers sit mostly under one bridge.
So to answer the question, “are all chronographs created equal?” I’d say no. Integrated chronographs will always outshine modular ones.